Updates from the trial and post-trial record, with primary-source evidence in the speakers’ own words. Karmelo was convicted on June 9, 2026, sentenced to 35 years, and is appealing.
Daily recaps from organizers on the ground and our attributed accounts of what happened in court. Every update is reviewed before it’s posted. Newest first.
In testimony widely reported as skeptical of self-defense, a student witness for the prosecution described the sequence plainly: “[The other student] leans in to push him, and Karmelo stabs him.” By the State’s own account, the physical contact began with the other student — while Karmelo sat with his hand resting in his bag.
Across two days of testimony, six student witnesses took the stand. Their accounts differ on how hard the other student shoved Karmelo — one hand or two — but not on the fact of the shove. The first contact is not in question. Only its degree.
Not our spin — the primary sources. A family member’s on-camera interview and the State’s own arrest affidavit. Read them yourself.
We are not in the courtroom. We are in the court of public opinion — and here the record speaks plainly. Read it for yourself, then ask the questions out loud.
A boy sat under a tent in the rain. By the family’s own words, a group approached him — “WE asked him to move.” By the State’s own witness, the other student pushed first. By the State’s own affidavit, hands were put on a seated child who had said only, “touch me and see what happens.”
The short read — Good: they have video, witnesses, a coroner. Not good: their own evidence says he was shoved first. So why is the boy who was pushed the only one in chains?
Prosecutors told the jury the surveillance footage “captured the entire incident” — from the moment Karmelo stepped under the tent to the moment he ran. So let the record state the sequence it shows:
The reported witness accounts differed over how the other student pushed Karmelo — including how hard — while placing that contact before Karmelo’s response.
The defense emphasized that Karmelo was seated while a group stood nearby and argued that he had no duty to retreat on public ground. The jury rejected the self-defense claim; the sequence remains part of the post-trial record.
Before a single fact was weighed, every Black prospective juror was struck. A Black child stood trial in a racially charged case — and not one juror of his own community remains to weigh his life. National outlets have named it. We name it too.
A fair trial is not only about the evidence. It is about who is permitted to judge it. There may be a day the truth shall fall — but not this day.
The defense invoked these statutes on Karmelo Anthony’s behalf. The jury rejected the self-defense claim; the post-trial record remains under review.
A person is justified in using force when and to the degree they reasonably believe it is immediately necessary to protect against another’s use of unlawful force. The affidavit states that the other student put hands on Karmelo first.
If you are somewhere you have a right to be and are not committing a crime, you have no duty to retreat before defending yourself. The defense argued that Karmelo was lawfully present at a public school event.
The defense argued that self-defense doctrine requires jurors to consider numbers and position, emphasizing testimony that Karmelo was seated while a group stood nearby.
Honor-roll student. No prior offenses. Turned himself in. A judge later found the original $1,000,000 bond excessive and reduced it. This is not the record of a danger to the community.
The internet convicted this boy before a jury was even seated. Stand on the record with us. Sign, share, and keep the truth louder than the noise.
Stand With Karmelo →